Monthly Archives: October 2009

Who’s Winning Now?

If you have ever founded or thought of starting up a company, chances are it all started with a product idea. Depending on your nature, this product might have been based on keen observations of customer needs, perhaps based on instinct that customers would want this product, or simply according to your interests. Surely, some companies might (and have) succeed even if their products are not based on actual measures of customer demand, perhaps from luck, or good insight. But generally, a company will succeed if it is customer oriented – if its goals are to satisfy customer needs.

The book Marketing Myopia , a reprint of the original article by Theodore Levitt published in 1960, illustrates the importance of customer orientation and marketing through the discussion of the evolution of different industries; an article that is still absolutely relevant and contemporary.

A Leading Nation

Much of the article focuses on the demise of the railroad industry and the impending failure of the oil industry should it not react promptly to the changing market demand. The author illustrates that the railroad industry has failed, not because of lower demand, but because it had failed to strategically position itself in the transportation industry in general. The industry could have adapted its products and services to better serve consumer needs that other companies have swiftly responded to (referring to the automobile industry). The industry was product oriented rather than customer oriented.

Other examples are the utility and oil industries. The first mostly known for its electricity companies and the second for its production of fuel. These industries are failing to successfully position themselves as energy companies in the broader sense. Instead of actively focusing on customer needs, companies in these industries are mostly focused on their core products. Rather than capitalizing on alternative energy sources they are focused on pushing out their current products to customers.

But not all are failing. Of all places, companies and governments in the United Arab Emirates have realized this fact and are now investing billions of dollars in alternative energy sources. The UAE has realized that if it is to keep its strategic advantage in the energy industry, now dominated by oil, it has to look at alternatives to better meet future customer demand. To further illustrate this, here are some striking facts. Abu Dhabi is investing $17 billion (USD) in clean alternative energy technology; $2 billion in solar technology and $15 billion for building the world’s largest hydrogen power plant (Middle East Electricity). In comparison, in 2005, global clean energy investment was estimated at US$42 billion (canREA). Think about it, Abu Dhabi, a city, is spending over 40% of that amount. Yes, a city is spending more than 40% of the global investment in alternative energy. Who’s missing out? Quite frankly, it’s incredibly shameful that USA and Canada are not doing more here; and shameful is quite an understatement. We have the chance of liberating ourselves from the stronghold of oil, yet, again, we’re leaving it to the hands of others to be the ultimate provider in energy. This leads me to think now might be the time for me to move in the UAE – seems like they’re showing more vision than we are.

Selling vs Marketing

If you look at the tech industry, I think you’ll notice many companies focusing more on technology and product than customer need. If you’ve read one of my previous posts, I’ve been through that, more than once. One of the reasons might be the passion for technology these entrepreneurs have, who, without sufficient business acumen may drive towards failure. It doesn’t mean you need an MBA to successfully run a company. It means it’s important that you focus on what really counts – what consumers want and need. Need is the keyword. The following quote from the book raises a very pertinent point. You can approach the problem by trying to push the product onto the customer through sales, or you can create and deliver a product that customers want in the first place.

“Selling focuses on the needs of the seller, marketing on the needs of the buyer. Selling is preoccupied with the seller’s need to convert the product into cash, marketing with the idea of satisfying the needs of the customer by means of the product and the whole cluster of things associated with creating, delivering, and, finally, consuming it. “

So it’s clear. My next startup will certainly be based on sound market studies and strong business foundations, which at the time of my first 2 startups I didn’t have. Remember the following:

“An industry begins with the customer and his or her needs, not with a patent, a raw material, or a selling skill.”

The patent and the selling skills are there to strategically position you in that industry and grow your market share.

For the past 3 years I’ve been working in the speech industry, more specifically with IVR systems. One of the core products I was working on is a self-care system for wireless carriers who were desperate to reduce customer care costs. So they put in place IVR systems to filter out customer care calls. Whenever I would tell someone that I worked on such systems I was always quick at saying that we were the ones working on making the systems better for the users. As if I was convincing them I wasn’t the bad guy making their lives, as consumers, miserable. What I’m trying to say here is that wireless carriers were simply looking at cost rather than looking at how to better serve the consumer while reducing their operational costs. Focus wasn’t put in the right place. I’m quite please to say that now I’m working on a mobile self-care solution (mobile app) that improves customer satisfaction while reducing the carrier’s customer care costs. I don’t have to shield myself anymore from those who I explain what I do for a living.

Words of Wisdom

Remember this; always consider customer needs and create a great vision for your company. Don’t lose yourself in a single product or technology, but follow your vision that focuses on satisfying customer needs. This is as important for startup companies, if not more, since it’s all too easy to focus on a product, the one you’re putting all those hours in to bring to market. I speak from the experience of not following these simple recommendations. On a final note, I leave you with the following quote from the book.

“No organization can achieve greatness without a vigorous leader who is driven onward by a pulsating will to success. A leader has to have a vision of grandeur, a vision that can produce eager followers in vast numbers. In business, the followers are the customers.”

Bookmark and Share

You’re a leader, too!

If you’ve been told or believe you can’t become an exceptional leader, and would like to get insight on how to achieve this, then this article is for you.

The book The Extraordinary Leader: Turning Good Managers into Great Leaders provides an inspirational view on leadership based on facts and research – not unnecessarily complex theories, models, and boring anecdotes. In fact, the revelations in this book are based on research data gathered on over 25,000 leaders from more than 200,000 questionnaires.

After reading this book, or even this article, you’ll be inspired and also questioning yourself and your career. But I believe that’s precisely what we need to effectively move forward in life.

A leader, defined

“People frequently confuse personality traits for leadership. They assume that assertiveness, or the ability to make a compelling speech or giving people crisp orders, is leadership. It is not.”

This is a very powerful statement. I think most of us have this preconceived vision of a good leader. We see it in movies, we read it in books, and we even hear it in the workplace. When I read this, all I could envision is this tall man giving a speech in a conference room, speaking loudly with such confidence that it is arrogance; just a tad more and the character starts hitting the podium stand to induce reaction in the crowd. This social preconception can also have serious consequences in our individual lives. Growing up as a shy and quiet person, no one in the world would have encouraged me in becoming a leader. The common reaction would probably be: “don’t worry, we’re not all born to be leaders”. But I’m not a follower. I’ve always done it my way, even if it’s not necessarily the best way. Now we have evidence, proof, that this is false. You’re not born a leader, you become one; through experience, belief, effort, learning, and continuous improvement. You need to constantly observe and integrate. Perhaps we’re not all made to be the extraordinary leader, but we can certainly be great leaders. So here it is – I encourage all of you who aspire to becoming great leaders to believe in yourself and work towards that goal. Don’t let go of that dream – keep moving on and reach for your goals. It’ll certainly be a whole lot of work, but it’s achievable.

Halo Effect

The authors discuss throughout the book the concept of halo effect – people form impressions of others based on a “big picture” rather than by focusing on individual traits. Although I’m familiar with this concept, it’s the first time that I extensively think of it in the context of leadership. This raises the point that you may be extremely strong in multiple areas, but if you fail in those that your peers or superiors find critical, then you will most likely be perceived as having lesser overall strengths. This may be related to your skills or even simply to facial expressions. If you talk to people that know me for instance, one thing they’re sure to comment about is that I don’t smile a lot. I have this serious looking face that may give the impression that I’m not easily approachable or even that I’m seriously unhappy – just look at my blog picture. But in reality none of the above is true. I realized that this affects how people perceive me and probably has impact in my career. That’s why I’m working to improve this – not to put a permanent fake smile on my face, but simply to show varying expressions rather than the unique grumpy image that I may portray.

Additional research results the authors present (from a study conducted by a different group) illustrate how people commonly group traits together; meaning that if you’re known to have a specific trait in one category, people will assume you have the other traits in that same category:

  • Bad social (e.g., unpopular, unsociable, boring, cold, moody, dishonest)
  • Good social (e.g., honest, happy, popular, reliable, modest, warm)
  • Bad intellectual (e.g., foolish, unintelligent, clumsy, wasteful, irresponsible)
  • Good intellectual (e.g., scientific, persistent, skillful, imaginative, intelligent)

So if people perceive me as being unsociable and clumsy for instance, they will most likely see me as also being boring, dishonest, unintelligent, and wasteful. Food for thought, isn’t it?

In relation to this, the authors present the concept of cross-training. Learning new skills will actually help you become better in other areas without having to directly focus on these other capabilities. This is a great motivation to improve ourselves in fewer areas at a time. Even though we may be focusing on improving one skill, say communication, this will have direct impact in how we perform in other tasks and disciplines. So in essence, the more we learn and self-develop, the better we get across the board. Based on my understanding, one of the ultimate objectives is becoming exceptional in at least two areas and eliminating any fatal flaws that you may have – eliminating your fatal flaws is critical. In that regards, here’s an interesting quote from the book:

“Being horrible at a competency gets noticed; being extraordinarily good gets noticed; but being average or good at something does not.”


The true leader in you

Understanding yourself, your unique strengths and weaknesses, and identifying your passions is a prevalent theme that most of us have probably heard before. What’s interesting here though is that the authors provide evidence of this importance and go further by explaining that there needs to be an intersection between competency, organizational needs, and passion for you to become an exceptional leader. You have to discover what your true competencies are and they have to fit with your organization’s needs. Your unique set of skills should be a strong asset to the company. In addition, being passionate about what you’re accomplishing will help you go further and become better.

Think. What do I really like; What am I really good in; What do I want to accomplish; With that being said, do I really fit in my current organization? The authors provide an example where a fresh graduate, that was brilliant in school, got hired by a consulting firm. After 6 months he was out with a severance package. He didn’t fit. A bit later he found a managerial position in a hospital and has quickly succeeded in his new role. He possessed the skills required by the organization, there was a good fit, and he was passionate about his position.

“the secret to life is discovering what “instrument” you are, and then learning how to play it.”

Final Note

This article certainly doesn’t pay justice to the book – it’s an extraordinary book with a wealth of information. I was truly inspired and immediately started reflecting on the book’s core message. You can become an extraordinary leader by eliminating your fatal flaws and by developing exceptional skills in the 5 pillars of leadership: character, focus on results, interpersonal skills, leading organizational change, and personal capability. What’s interesting is that you don’t need to be exceptional in all areas to be perceived as an extraordinary leader. So long as you have the right balance of strengths and have managed to correct your fatal flaws, as perceived by yourself, your peers, and your organization.

To conclude, I guarantee you will be inspired, but at the same time also be prepared to be confused or discouraged. The revelations will surely have you question yourself, your job, your organization, and what you want to achieve in life. If you manage to constructively integrate this knowledge, you’re up for positive change – that’s my opinion.

Bookmark and Share

From Widgets to Software – Learning from the manufacturing industry

In the economic or business context, a widget is a generic word for a manufactured good or unit. Not surprisingly, the software industry has widely adopted the term in reference to small applications. If you Google the word you’ll find that Apple and Yahoo! use the term for their small desktop applications.

In fact, this isn’t the only concept that the software industry borrowed from manufacturing. This may astonish many of you, but the term Agile, relating to production, was actually first employed in the manufacturing industry in the late 1970’s and early 80’s. Companies that used “agile manufacturing” were those willing to think outside the box and that had taken major steps in becoming more customer-focused (McClellan, 2002). Agile software development stems directly from this lean approach to production. What’s interesting is that the “agile methodology” has been widely accepted by this industry; if you search for the term in online book stores, you’ll find thousands of results, even just within the IT related categories.

However, the agile methodology is really part of the broader concepts of lean and total quality management (TQM) that W Edwards Deming and others have pioneered and that have lead to the quality revolution in Japan. In fact, the astounding success of the Japanese private industry (e.g.: Toyota) was largely attributed to the production process quality, rather than research and development, through process innovation (Peach et. al, 2005).

Within TQM you’ll find statistical process control (SPC), which consists in monitoring process performance and variability through the statistical analysis of sample production data (Chase, Jacobs, Aquilano, 2006). Since processes are subject to natural and external variations, some of the core objectives of SPC consist in recognizing, quantifying, controlling and reducing process variations (Does, Schippers, Trip, 1997). Although such control methods may bring substantial benefits to service organizations, including increased efficiency and higher customer satisfaction, SPC doesn’t appear to yet have effectively made its way in the service industry (Roes, Dorr, 1997).

Approach

From such lessons, software organizations should look at defining organizational goals that aim at providing total quality to customers by systematically reducing waste, as well as continuously improving the organization as a whole through skills improvement, efficiency, and quality. To achieve this, organizations should look at defining and implementing processes that are:

  • Inline with organizational and customer goals
  • Lean and efficient
  • Measurable and Adaptable

Word of Caution

If you look at the automotive industry, where companies such as Toyota and Honda have largely dominated the market in terms of customer satisfaction, software organizations should be wary of what may come in the next years. Are Indian and Chinese based software companies the next Japanese quality revolution? In my opinion, absolutely! We’ve pumped billions of dollars in software outsourcing and with such an immense pool of skilled individuals I don’t see why or how the software industry won’t suffer from a similar blow.

I’ll be posting another article soon on this topic. Specifically on how to measure the software process.

References

Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2006). Operations management for competitive advantage (11th ed). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.

Does, R., Schippers, W., Trip, A. (1997). A framework for implementation of statistical process control, International Journal of Quality Science, 2(3), pp.181-198

McClellan, M. (2002). Collaborative Manufacturing: Using Real-Time Information to Support the Supply Chain (Hardcover), CRC Press

Roes, K., Dorr, D. (1997). Implementing statistical process control in service processes, International Journal of Quality Science, 2(3), p.149-166

Peach, H., Emeagwali, G., Wilson, F., Borisov, V., Dutta, D., Nakayama, S., Lins, R., Teixeira, M., Robbins, R. (2005). “technology in history” Science, Technology, and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford Reference Online, Retrieved 21 October 2009 from http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?subview=Main&entry=t210.e110-s6

Bookmark and Share