Monthly Archives: March 2010

Paying to Death

I’m an advocate for a public healthcare system. Why? There’s no incentive to have a healthy population when the whole system is privatized. Instead of preventing illnesses and tackling health issues at the root, a privatized healthcare system will look at treatment rather than prevention. There’s no money to be made if the population is healthy.

However, a public system should not equate an inefficient system. Unfortunately, that’s how it is in Quebec. Endless bureaucracy, inefficient staff, and an entrenched culture of inefficacy is what we have. Make no mistake, there are very hard working individuals, but the system as a whole seems to promote inefficient practices.

Similarly to how a private system has no incentive to deal with the root cause of illnesses, our public system and government seems to have no interest in dealing with the root cause of our highly expensive healthcare. In fact, rather than enforcing better management practices and looking at strategically cutting costs, our Quebec government, with the help of our Finance Minister Raymond Bachand, have decided to “solve” the problem by increasing fees and raising taxes; A recipe for disaster if you want my opinion. The new budget calls for a 2% increase in the sales tax, added healthcare fees, and the possible introduction of a deductible.

So tell me this dear government, why not even attempt at reducing cost from within rather than pushing on the problem to the population? Here’s one simple idea, let’s put in place performance based management like corporations do? Honestly, let’s look at the healthcare system as what it is, a large system, and introduce operational excellence and various cost cutting measures. Stop avoiding the issue and address it once and for all. Will the 2% increase in sales tax really solve the problem? To me it sounds more like it will hinder the economic recovery.

Sometimes it feels like our ministers earn their positions by picking a random title in a hat. Look at that, they’re really proud of themselves. By the way, insulting another culture is not a proper way of defending your budget Mr. Bachand. See the full story on CBC here .

Bookmark and Share

Red Ocean, Blue Ocean, or Brown Swamp Strategy?

Before I get started on this article, I just want to mention that I just graduated from my MBA. It’s been quite an interesting journey. Now I can take a step back and fully embark on my next project. Also I would like to apologize for not posting a new article in a month; needless to say that I was a tad exhausted in the last few weeks. But now I’m back and will continue to write articles on my blog.

My last MBA class was Business Strategy. It was interesting but lacked, in my opinion, substance and creative thought. What’s exciting about business strategy is that it encompasses every business discipline. To be an exceptional strategist you need to be strong in all aspects and have a holistic vision of the company. With my strong generalist profile, forward thinking, and integrative mindset I believe there holds a good future for me in business strategy. At the end of the course we touched on the Red and Blue Ocean strategies. Here’s a description of these concepts from WikiPedia:

Red Oceans are all the industries in existence today—the known market space. In the red oceans, industry boundaries are defined and accepted, and the competitive rules of the game are known. Here companies try to outperform their rivals to grab a greater share of product or service demand. As the market space gets crowded, prospects for profits and growth are reduced. Products become commodities or niche, and cutthroat competition turns the ocean bloody. Hence, the term red oceans.

Blue oceans, in contrast, denote all the industries not in existence today—the unknown market space, untainted by competition. In blue oceans, demand is created rather than fought over. There is ample opportunity for growth that is both profitable and rapid. In blue oceans, competition is irrelevant because the rules of the game are waiting to be set. Blue Ocean is an analogy to describe the wider, deeper potential of market space that is not yet explored.

Creating a Blue Ocean is extremely difficult and requires uniquely creative and innovative thinking. In addition, any business embarking in this journey will be taking huge risk since there is no industry benchmark, no guidelines, and no points of reference; You’re creating the market. Not everyone is willing to take this risk.

If the Red Ocean represents all the industries in existence today and a Blue Ocean is the new market space yet to be defined, then what is a Brown Swamp? I don’t know for you, but as a kid I was a huge fan of Slush Puppie!! I would drink one every day in the summer. What I liked the most is to mix EVERY flavor – we called it the Swamp because of the brown color it had. Well similar to a Slush Puppie that mixes every flavor, I see the Brown Swamp business strategy as a disorganized mashup of strategies and functional tactics that, taken individually, make a lot sense. So what happens when you take a bunch of good strategies and put them all together without proper ordering? I believe you end up with a disordered and inefficient long-term business strategy – a Brown Swamp.

With that being said, I believe that Order of Execution is critical in successfully running a business. You may have many good strategies, but if they’re not executed in the proper order it will be difficult to succeed. To illustrate this point I’ll take one of my past pet projects which I briefly introduced in my article entitled 6 things NOT to do when starting a business – Part 1. The project was a multi-media mashup application. The long term functional plan for this project included among other objectives:

  1. Develop the core platform, focused on the mashup tool (scrapbooking)
  2. Develop complimentary multimedia applications, including: a) Online Photo Editor a la Photoshop, b) Online Video Editor
  3. Offer an Online Storage service to backup your multimedia files

Based on this sequence, the entire project relied on the success of the “scrapbooking” platform. The whole strategy assumed a successful launch of this application and thereafter allowing the introduction of other value-added tools and services. As you now know, this scrapbooking application wasn’t a success (in a short timeframe) for numerous reasons that I won’t cover here today. From this, we see the importance of short-term objectives and tasks that makeup the long-term strategy. How would it have panned out if I had chosen to use the online Photo Editor as the core platform? Hypothetically, the project could have been acquired by Google , assuming I had started development sooner. To prove my point, Google just recently acquired Picnik, an online Photo Editing application.

My point here is that strategy is important, but without proper execution, your $1bn strategy may have little value.

Will you be the next big business acquisition?

Bookmark and Share